When online commenters detect my art as AI
When online commenters 'detect' my art as AI Published on 05 august 2026 Here is a collection of screenshots (obfuscated) of dozens and dozens of online comments from many platforms (Reddit, YouTube, Instagram, Facebook) containing accusations or confusion that my artworks and comics are AI-generated. Despite creating every piece by hand, despite sharing timelapses, the comments keep coming, and they're getting stronger. Making this collection was the source of frustration inspiration for my weekly comic episode 64, Authenticity Problem.
- ▪When online commenters 'detect' my art as AI Published on 05 august 2026 Here is a collection of screenshots (obfuscated) of dozens and dozens of online comments from many platforms (Reddit, YouTube, Instagram, Facebook) containing accusati
- ▪Despite creating every piece by hand, despite sharing timelapses, the comments keep coming, and they're getting stronger.
- ▪Making this collection was the source of frustration inspiration for my weekly comic episode 64, Authenticity Problem.
Hacker News (AI / LLM) files mainly under ai. We currently carry 3,763 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | David Revoy |
| Canonical URL | https://www.davidrevoy.com/article1164/when-online-commenters-detect-my-art-as-ai |
| Publication time | Wed, 05 Aug 2026 20:58:52 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-08-05T21:10:47.403Z |
| Last seen | 2026-08-05T21:10:47.403Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | NWQDKAfzNYAH · 1 stories |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
When online commenters 'detect' my art as AI Published on 05 august 2026 Here is a collection of screenshots (obfuscated) of dozens and dozens of online comments from many platforms (Reddit, YouTube, Instagram, Facebook) containing accusations or confusion that my artworks and comics are AI-generated. Despite creating every piece by hand, despite sharing timelapses, the comments keep coming, and they're getting stronger. Making this collection was the source of frustration inspiration for my weekly comic episode 64, Authenticity Problem. I hope it gives you a sense of what it feels like and how problematic it is for artists like me in 2026 who are "prime" sources for AI image generation training data, with over 20 years of my art online trained without my consent...
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at David Revoy.