WeSearch

When random.bytes() runs but doesn't work

Dusty Daemon· ·6 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 3 views
When random.bytes() runs but doesn't work
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

The more lines of code that you change, the more comments explaining why you’re changing the code. More message and less code changes per commit is generally a good idea.Here is an example chosen randomly from some of my own work.The commit message is 235 characters, and the commit changes 15 lines of code. Setting this value to zero tells the default micropython rng code to not use the hardware RNG device and that it should use the Yasmarang RNG instead.

Key facts
About this source

Hacker News (Front Page) files mainly under programming. We currently carry 936 of its stories. Top-voted stories on Hacker News.

Original article
Btcpp · Dusty Daemon
Read full at Btcpp →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherBtcpp
Canonical URLhttps://insider.btcpp.dev/p/when-randombytes-runs-but-doesnt
Publication timeSun, 02 Aug 2026 02:08:26 +0000
Retrieval time2026-08-02T03:28:55.512Z
Last seen2026-08-02T03:28:55.512Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
ClusterVTWOwmWXBs4P · 1 stories
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

OpEdWhen random.bytes() runs but doesn't workWhat a commit message tells us about the recent COLDCARD bugDusty DaemonAug 01, 20262232ShareThis is a guest post from noted Core-Lightning developer, ddustin, who dug into the Coldcard firmware commit history to uncover what happened and why the code failed.IntroI began investigating the Coldcard hack and was immediately shocked. I need to explain why.When we developers work on code, we organize or code changes into changesets we call “commits.” The purpose of doing so is to show a clear history of what code was changed including why and how.This is done precisely for instances like this where it appears Bitcoiner’s funds are being stolen en masse, so we can investigate and understand exactly how it could happen.Good developers write clear…

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Btcpp.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from Btcpp