WeSearch

Will AI become conscious? What a philosopher and a neuroscientist think

https://www.abc.net.au/btn/classroom/wren-gillett/103505396· ·6 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 34 views
#artificial intelligence#consciousness#philosophy
Will AI become conscious? What a philosopher and a neuroscientist think
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

The debate over whether AI can become conscious continues among experts. A recent experiment showed that many participants struggled to distinguish between human and AI conversations, with some AI models passing the Turing Test. While some philosophers see the potential for conscious machines in the future, others remain skeptical about the possibility of true consciousness in AI.

Key facts
About this source

ABC News (Australia) publishes from Australia and files mainly under world. We currently carry 1,394 of its stories.

Original article
ABC News (Australia) · https://www.abc.net.au/btn/classroom/wren-gillett/103505396
Read full at ABC News (Australia) →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherABC News (Australia)
Canonical URLhttps://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-05-30/artificial-intelligence-ai-will-it-be-conscious-in-the-future/106738770
Publication timeSat, 30 May 2026 03:59:30 +0000
Retrieval time2026-05-30T04:11:57.314Z
Last seen2026-05-30T04:11:57.314Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
ClusterlXot5WVCsNBm
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Will AI be conscious in the future? Here's what a philosopher and a neuroscientist thinkBy BTN High reporter Wren GillettTopic:AISat 30 May 2026 at 1:59pmSat 30 May 2026 at 1:59pmSat 30 May 2026 at 1:59pmIn an experiment, many participants couldn't work out if they were having a conversation with a human or AI. (BTN High)abc.net.au/news/artificial-intelligence-ai-will-it-be-conscious-in-the-future/106738770Link copiedShareShare articleIn March last year, the Department of Cognitive Science at the University of California, San Diego, published the results of an experiment.It had asked almost 300 people to have a conversation with two mystery partners, one human and one AI, and try to determine which was which.Many couldn't.When chatting with OpenAI's ChatGPT GPT‑4.5, which had been asked…

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at ABC News (Australia).

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments