‘You’ actor Tom Francis auditioning to play James Bond, report reveals
Tom Francis, known for his role in 'You', is reportedly auditioning for the iconic role of James Bond. The casting process is currently underway to find a successor to Daniel Craig. Fans are eager to see who will take on the legendary character next.
- ▪Tom Francis is auditioning for the role of James Bond.
- ▪He is recognized for his performance in the series 'You'.
- ▪Casting is in progress to find Daniel Craig's successor.
2 outlets in our directory ran this story, first to last over 36 hours. All of the coverage we found sits in one bucket: lean left. That one-sidedness is itself worth noticing.
NME publishes from United Kingdom and files mainly under music. We currently carry 251 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | NME |
| Canonical URL | https://www.nme.com/news/film/you-actor-tom-francis-auditioning-to-play-james-bond-report-reveals-3945940?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=you-actor-tom-francis-auditioning-to-play-james-bond-report-reveals |
| Publication time | Mon, 18 May 2026 10:55:51 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-18T11:04:56.482Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-18T11:04:56.482Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | X6H88EkRcKSc · 2 stories |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
/* custom css */ .tdi_66{ min-height: 0; } /* custom css */ .tdi_68, .tdi_68 .tdc-columns{ min-height: 0; }.tdi_68, .tdi_68 .tdc-columns{ display: block; }.tdi_68 .tdc-columns{ width: 100%; } /* inline tdc_css att */ .tdi_68{ padding-top:24px !important; padding-bottom:18px !important; } .tdi_68 .td_block_wrap{ text-align:left } /* custom css */ .tdi_70{ vertical-align: baseline; }.tdi_70 > .wpb_wrapper, .tdi_70 > .wpb_wrapper > .tdc-elements{ display: block; }.tdi_70 > .wpb_wrapper > .tdc-elements{ width: 100%; }.tdi_70 > .wpb_wrapper > .vc_row_inner{ width: auto; }.tdi_70 > .wpb_wrapper{ width: auto; height: auto; } /* custom css */ .tdb-breadcrumbs{ margin-bottom: 11px; font-size: 12px; color: #747474; line-height: 18px; }.tdb-breadcrumbs a{ color: #747474; }.tdb-breadcrumbs a:hover{…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at NME.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from NME
