'Absurd': Social Media Misquotes Journalist, Erroneously Claims Sony Is Angry at Naughty Dog
A misinterpretation of journalist Jason Schreier's comments led to false claims that Sony is angry with Naughty Dog. The confusion arose from a discussion about game development costs and timelines. Schreier clarified that his remarks were taken out of context, emphasizing that Sony's concerns were about overall development expenses rather than a specific issue with Naughty Dog.
- ▪Jason Schreier's comments about game development costs were misrepresented on social media.
- ▪The misunderstanding suggested that Sony was specifically unhappy with Naughty Dog.
- ▪Schreier clarified that his remarks were about general concerns regarding development expenses.
Push Square (PS) files mainly under gaming. We currently carry 80 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Push Square (PS) |
| Canonical URL | https://www.pushsquare.com/news/2026/05/absurd-social-media-misquotes-journalist-erroneously-claims-sony-is-angry-at-naughty-dog |
| Publication time | Mon, 25 May 2026 23:00:00 GMT |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-25T22:07:40.571Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-25T22:07:40.571Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | sE6C1ZWcAbG3 |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
NewsSonyPS5IndustryNaughty Dog 'Absurd': Social Media Misquotes Journalist, Erroneously Claims Sony Is Angry at Naughty Dog Another day at the office by Sammy BarkerTomorrow 00:00 Share: A fairly tame exchange between reliable Bloomberg journalist Jason Schreier and a reader has resulted in a bunch of bad actors on social media saying Sony is “angry” with Naughty Dog. It all somehow started on Bluesky a few days ago, when Schreier shared his exclusive report on Bungie. Company that has no issue letting Naughty Dog spend 5+ years and $300 million on a single player title now concerned about spending money on a new MMO shooter with a built in fanbase, just fantastic— Gavo (@gavowastaken.bsky.social) 2026-05-22T00:17:11.832Z Oh they definitely have an issue with that— Jason Schreier…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Push Square (PS).
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Push Square (PS)
