Appeals court denies Trump’s bid to allow $100,000 fee on new H-1B visas
The US president issued a proclamation in September that raised the cost of obtaining H-1B visas. Photograph: Andrew Harnik/Getty ImagesView image in fullscreenThe US president issued a proclamation in September that raised the cost of obtaining H-1B visas.
- ▪The US president issued a proclamation in September that raised the cost of obtaining H-1B visas.
- ▪Photograph: Andrew Harnik/Getty ImagesView image in fullscreenThe US president issued a proclamation in September that raised the cost of obtaining H-1B visas.
4 outlets in our directory ran this story, first to last over 2 hours. All of the coverage we found sits in one bucket: centre. That one-sidedness is itself worth noticing.
- ▪ Appeals court rejects Trump bid to halt $129,000 skilled visa fee ruling — Straits Times — World
- ▪ Setback for Trump: US appeals court refuses to revive $100,000 H-1B visa fee — Times of India — Top
- ▪ Appeals court rejects Trump bid to halt $100,000 H-1B visa fee ruling — Investing.com — News
The Guardian — US files mainly under news. We currently carry 366 of its stories.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
The US president issued a proclamation in September that raised the cost of obtaining H-1B visas. Photograph: Andrew Harnik/Getty ImagesView image in fullscreenThe US president issued a proclamation in September that raised the cost of obtaining H-1B visas. Photograph: Andrew Harnik/Getty ImagesTrump administrationAppeals court denies Trump’s bid to allow $100,000 fee on new H-1B visasThree-judge panel of Democratic appointees let stand lower court’s ruling that fee constitutes an unlawful tax ReutersFri 24 Jul 2026 19.38 EDTSharePrefer the Guardian on GoogleA federal appeals court on Friday rejected a bid by Donald Trump’s administration to halt a judge’s order preventing it from imposing a $100,000 fee on new H-1B visas for highly skilled foreign workers.The Boston-based first US…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The Guardian — US.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from The Guardian — US
