WeSearch

U.S. court rejects Trump administration bid to revive $100,000 H-1B visa fee

6 sources covered this ⚠ Left-only compare →
Center: 2 (Investing.com — News, Times of India — Top); Lean Left: 1 (The Guardian — US).
AP· ·2 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 7 views
#court#rejects#trump#administration#revive
U.S. court rejects Trump administration bid to revive $100,000 H-1B visa fee
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

A U.S. federal appeals court has refused to stay a lower court order striking down the Trump administration's decision to impose a $100,000 fee on H-1B visas for highly skilled foreign workers.The three-judge Bench at the Boston-based First Circuit Court of Appeals denied the federal government's motion to stay U.S. District Judge Leo T Sorokin's June 8 ruling that struck down the fee, terming it an unlawful tax not authorised by Congress. It is whether Congress has done so".President Donald Trump had issued a proclamation in September last year imposing a $100,000 fee for obtaining new H-1B visas.

Key facts
How this story was covered

6 outlets in our directory ran this story, first to last over 6 hours. Coverage spans 2 points on the political spectrum — 2 lean left, 3 centre.

Lean left · 2Centre · 3
About this source

The Hindu — Top publishes from India and files mainly under world. We currently carry 6,934 of its stories.

Original article
The Hindu — Top · AP
Read full at The Hindu — Top →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

A U.S. federal appeals court has refused to stay a lower court order striking down the Trump administration's decision to impose a $100,000 fee on H-1B visas for highly skilled foreign workers.The three-judge Bench at the Boston-based First Circuit Court of Appeals denied the federal government's motion to stay U.S. District Judge Leo T Sorokin's June 8 ruling that struck down the fee, terming it an unlawful tax not authorised by Congress. Why was Trump’s H-1B fee struck down?"...we deny the defendants' motion to stay pending appeal to this Court, the district court's June 8, 2026, Memorandum and Order and accompanying Judgment,” the Bench ruled on Friday (July 24, 2026).The judges agreed with the plaintiffs — 20 Democrat-ruled States — that "the question here is not whether Congress may…

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The Hindu — Top.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from The Hindu — Top