Ask HN: Is anyone working at least 4 hours daily on an Apple Vision Pro?
The article discusses skepticism about the Apple Vision Pro (AVP) as a future device for most users. It argues that while AVP offers a luxury of focus, it is impractical and expensive compared to traditional monitors and headphones. The author believes that the logistical challenges and costs associated with AVP make it less viable for widespread use in workplaces.
- ▪The Apple Vision Pro is seen as a luxury device that may not be practical for most users.
- ▪Traditional monitors and headphones are significantly cheaper and more functional for workplace needs.
- ▪Implementing AVP in an office setting poses logistical challenges, including personal fitting and prescription management.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Hiya. Sorry, but you might not like what I have to say - I still hope that you read it all though.I doubt that this is the future. Maybe it is for a small number of people on HN, but outside of this site there's no way it's the future.You're amazed by this because it's the ultimate expression of the luxury of focus. Unfortunately whilst developers and artists get the luxury of focus, most other people don't. Most other people have either responsibilities or duties that require them to be interruptable.Being interrupted sucks. But for most people it's a fundamental part of their job. IT, HR, Finance, Security/Compliance, Facilities, and so many more. As an example for folks in sales not being interrupted may mean a lost sale.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Ycombinator.