Believe it or not, I’m lost for a word
The article explores the linguistic challenge of describing things that are not truly what they claim to be, such as honorary awards or disputed achievements. It examines examples like the FIFA Peace Prize and honorary Oscars, which resemble real accolades but lack their authenticity. The author seeks a precise term for these 'quasi-things' that exist in a gray area between genuine and fake.
- ▪The FIFA Peace Prize awarded to Donald Trump is presented as an example of a recognition that appears official but lacks legitimacy.
- ▪Honorary Oscars are described as 'better-than-nothing Oscars,' acknowledged as awards but not earned through competitive merit.
- ▪Carlos Alcaraz achieved a career grand slam in tennis, though not within a single calendar year, leading to debate over its classification.
- ▪The Melbourne Storm's NRL titles from 2006 and 2008 were officially removed due to salary cap violations, marking their wins with asterisks in records.
- ▪The Isle of Skye's status as an island has been questioned since the 1995 bridge connected it to the mainland, challenging its geographical definition.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","dateModified":"2026-05-01T08:00:00Z","datePublished":"2026-05-01T08:00:00Z","description":"What do you call it when a thing is not really a thing?","headline":"Believe it or not, I’m lost for a word","keywords":"WordPlay, Just in, Opinion, For subscribers, Spectrum","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"David Astle","jobTitle":"Crossword compiler and ABC Radio Melbourne…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The Sydney Morning Herald.