WeSearch

Binary Coverage the Wrong Way

·12 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 5 views

Collecting code coverage for blackbox binaries the wrong way.

Original article
Redvice
Read full at Redvice →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Jul 3, 2026 • Charlie Binary Coverage the Wrong Way The Right Way Way back in the age of the dinosaurs, if you wrote a program and wanted to test that it was correct, you mostly had two choices: you could either manually construct malformed inputs and try them in succession, or hook up a program which would randomly generate inputs and try them automatically 1. Those programs were called fuzzers, or sometimes generators, and this was “fuzz testing”. It also for quite a long time wasn’t very good: the generator would have no feedback from the program under test except “did this random input crash or not”.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Redvice.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from Redvice