Did Obergefell produce the benefits that advocates predicted?

Some arguments that led to the redefinition of marriage in Obergefell v. Hodges in 2015 seemed to be common-sense, practical arguments. Supporters argued that legal recognition of marriage by same-sex couples would provide greater stability for same-sex couples, encourage marriage over cohabitation, and improve the well-being of sexual minorities. Many Americans found those arguments persuasive, even some of those who had reservations hoped that granting marriage licenses to same-sex couples would strengthen relationships and improve lives.But now, 11 years later, we are no longer limited to predictions. We now have data.

…

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Washington Examiner.