Elizabeth Warren Gets Wrecked by Community Notes for Trying to Spin Spirit Airlines Comments
Senator Elizabeth Warren faced backlash on social media for contradicting her previous support of the blocked JetBlue-Spirit Airlines merger after Spirit Airlines collapsed. She initially praised the merger's rejection as a 'Biden win for flyers' to protect consumers, but later lamented reduced competition and higher prices following Spirit's bankruptcy. Community Notes on X highlighted the inconsistency, drawing widespread criticism of her stance.
- ▪The Biden administration, through the Department of Justice, blocked the JetBlue-Spirit Airlines merger in 2024.
- ▪Elizabeth Warren celebrated the blocked merger as beneficial for consumers, calling it a 'Biden win for flyers.'
- ▪Spirit Airlines filed for bankruptcy twice in 2024 and ultimately ceased operations in 2026.
- ▪Warren later blamed the collapse on a Reagan-appointed judge and rising fuel prices, shifting responsibility away from the merger decision.
- ▪Community Notes on X called out Warren's contradictory statements, leading to significant online criticism.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Elizabeth Warren Gets Wrecked by Community Notes for Trying to Spin Spirit Airlines Comments By Nick Arama | 6:28 PM on May 02, 2026 The opinions expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of RedState.com. AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin My colleague Ward Clark reported earlier on Saturday on how Spirit Airlines had finally gone under, after being in financial trouble for years. But as his story noted, one of the big things that may have contributed to their demise was that the Biden administration moved to block a merger with JetBlue that might have helped both companies: Advertisement googletag.cmd.push(function () { googletag.display("div-gpt-300x250_2"); //googletag.pubads().refresh([gptAdSlot["div-gpt-300x250_2"]]) }); Although neither Spirit nor…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at RedState.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from RedState
