Ex-FCDO chief tells MPs he had concerns over Mandelson’s Epstein links

Sir Philip Barton appearing before the foreign affairs select committee. Photograph: House of Commons/UK Parliament/PAView image in fullscreenSir Philip Barton appearing before the foreign affairs select committee. Photograph: House of Commons/UK Parliament/PAPeter MandelsonEx-FCDO chief tells MPs he had concerns over Mandelson’s Epstein linksPhilip Barton says there was pressure over pace of vetting from No 10, which he says was ‘uninterested’ in process UK politics live – latest updates Jessica Elgot Deputy political editorTue 28 Apr 2026 05.38 EDTLast modified on Tue 28 Apr 2026 06.31 EDTSharePrefer the Guardian on GoogleThe former Foreign Office chief has said he was concerned about Peter Mandelson’s links to Jeffery Epstein – and said there was “absolutely” pressure from Downing Street over the pace of vetting.Giving evidence to the foreign affairs select committee, the former Foreign Office permanent secretary Sir Philip Barton said Number 10 seemed “uninterested” in the vetting process around Mandelson’s appointment as US ambassador, and said there were no avenues for him to express his concerns.Asked if he was under pressure to get the vetting done quickly, Barton said: “Absolutely … I don’t think anyone could have been any doubt in the department working on this, that there was pressure to get everything done as quickly as possible.”But Barton denied that he had received any phone call from Keir Starmer’s former chief of staff Morgan McSweeney – long rumoured – which had asked him to “just fucking approve it”.Barton, who left the Foreign Office in January, said he was unaware of Number 10’s intention to appoint Mandelson until a day before the announcement. “I wasn’t involved, I wasn’t told a decision was coming,” he told the committee. McSweeney is expected to give evidence later on Tuesday morning.What is ‘DV’? Key terms used in the Mandelson vetting row explainedRead moreBarton told the committee he believed his concerns about Epstein were shared by the national security adviser, Jonathan Powell.But he said the “die was cast” and that there was no possibility of advising against the appointment. He told the committee that it was unusual to announce the appointment before vetting had been completed. “The normal order is vetting then announcement,” he said.Barton said he had been in discussions with the former ambassador Karen Pierce about extending her appointment in the US, but he was presented with the Mandelson appointment “and told to get on with it … There was no space for dialogue.”Barton said he was well aware of the “toxic” nature of the Epstein connection from his time in the US and his understanding of American politics. “I didn’t know anything that wasn’t in the public domain. Now we know a lot more about Mandelson’s links to Epstein.View image in fullscreenBarton appearing before the foreign affairs select committee. Photograph: UK Parliament“But I had a concern that a man who, demonstrably from the public record at the time … had a link to Epstein. [I knew] that Epstein, through the presidential election campaign in the US and more generally in US politics, had been and was a controversial figure, and I was worried that this could become a problem in future.”He said there was “no space or avenue or mechanism for me to put that on the table” even though he said he was aware of tweets from those close to Trump reminding the incoming president about Mandelson’s negative comments about Trump.Powell’s own concerns…

This excerpt is published under fair use for community discussion. Read the full article at the Guardian.