First RX 9050 Tests Suggest It's Much Slower Than RTX 5050
Unsurprisingly, the first benchmarks for the RX 9050 graphics card are unimpressive. But this $280 card can't hold a candle to the RTX 5050, which features better upscaling support for $300.In test results translated from GDM, the RX 9050 managed a score of 9,441 in 3DMark Time Spy, while the RTX 5050 got 10,571. The RTX 5050 held a more than 23% advantage in Fire Strike score, and an almost 27% lead in Port Royal.
- ▪Unsurprisingly, the first benchmarks for the RX 9050 graphics card are unimpressive.
- ▪But this $280 card can't hold a candle to the RTX 5050, which features better upscaling support for $300.In test results translated from GDM, the RX 9050 managed a score of 9,441 in 3DMark Time Spy, while the RTX 5050 got 10,571.
- ▪The RTX 5050 held a more than 23% advantage in Fire Strike score, and an almost 27% lead in Port Royal.
PCMag files mainly under tech. We currently carry 353 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | PCMag |
| Canonical URL | https://www.pcmag.com/news/first-rx-9050-tests-suggest-its-much-slower-than-rtx-5050 |
| Publication time | Fri, 31 Jul 26 16:19:48 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-07-31T16:23:06.271Z |
| Last seen | 2026-07-31T16:23:06.271Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | ft8BfNUHdk4w · 1 stories |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Unsurprisingly, the first benchmarks for the RX 9050 graphics card are unimpressive. Although there are some discrepancies in testing methodology that need to be considered, the results show the new AMD card as substantially slower than Nvidia's RTX 5050, VideoCardz reports.The RX 9050 was unveiled earlier this week, and its specs are underwhelming, with a mere 16 Compute Units and a 128-bit memory bus for its 8GB of 18Gbps GDDR6 memory. It was never going to be a powerhouse. But this $280 card can't hold a candle to the RTX 5050, which features better upscaling support for $300.In test results translated from GDM, the RX 9050 managed a score of 9,441 in 3DMark Time Spy, while the RTX 5050 got 10,571.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at PCMag.