Hundreds of Drone-as-First-Responder Programs to Be Launched Across the Country
Police departments across the country are lining up to launch drone-as-first-responder (DFR) programs, and hundreds have cleared a necessary hurdle toward making deployment a reality, expanding aerial surveillance and data collection even in areas patrol officers typically can't reach. The changes led to a massive increase in the number of waivers issued. Only 976 DFR waivers had been granted since the first DFR program launched in 2018 through April 2025, according to an FAA representative.
- ▪Police departments across the country are lining up to launch drone-as-first-responder (DFR) programs, and hundreds have cleared a necessary hurdle toward making deployment a reality, expanding aerial surveillance and data collection even i
- ▪The changes led to a massive increase in the number of waivers issued.
- ▪Only 976 DFR waivers had been granted since the first DFR program launched in 2018 through April 2025, according to an FAA representative.
Hacker News (Newest) files mainly under programming. We currently carry 5,288 of its stories.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Police departments across the country are lining up to launch drone-as-first-responder (DFR) programs, and hundreds have cleared a necessary hurdle toward making deployment a reality, expanding aerial surveillance and data collection even in areas patrol officers typically can't reach. As of February 2026, over 1,000 public safety agencies—including police, fire, and other emergency management agencies—had received Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) waivers needed to automate drone operations and launch a DFR program, according to a recent Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) release listing agencies that have obtained Part 91 waivers since the FAA streamlined and sped up the process in April 2025. The changes led to a massive increase in the number of waivers issued.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Electronic Frontier Foundation.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Electronic Frontier Foundation
