ICML final decisions rant [D]
·
0 reactions
·
0 comments
·
7 views
So, ICML accepted ~6.5K of ~24K; obviously, it doesn't mean that all the rejected papers are "bad," and these rejected papers would cascade to NeurIPS, blowing up NeurIPS' total submission count, and this cycle of massive-influx-small-acceptance would repeat on an endless loop. The reviews themselves can be frustratingly inadequate: "Only 200 benchmarks included, didn't show performance on this other benchmark" (exaggerated for dramatic effect, sadly doesn't seem so unrealistic); or "I don't thi
Original article
Machine Learning
Anonymous · no account needed