Judges Should Not Cave to Preferred Pronouns
On the final day of the Supreme Court’s 2025 term, the Court delivered a resounding victory for biological reality. Hecox, the Court allowed West Virginia and Idaho to reserve women’s and girls’ sports for biological females. The majority reached this outcome on two grounds.
- ▪On the final day of the Supreme Court’s 2025 term, the Court delivered a resounding victory for biological reality.
- ▪Hecox, the Court allowed West Virginia and Idaho to reserve women’s and girls’ sports for biological females.
- ▪The majority reached this outcome on two grounds.
The American Spectator files mainly under politics. We currently carry 125 of its stories.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
On the final day of the Supreme Court’s 2025 term, the Court delivered a resounding victory for biological reality. In West Virginia v. B.P.J. and Little v. Hecox, the Court allowed West Virginia and Idaho to reserve women’s and girls’ sports for biological females. The majority reached this outcome on two grounds. First, a unanimous Court held that Title IX’s sports regulations authorize separate teams for each sex in competitive and contact sports. Second, the majority held that the state laws complied with the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause.In all, the Justices produced five separate opinions. Those opinions debated several nuanced legal questions.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.
Discussion
0 comments
