WeSearch

Lawsuit from Democratic-led ⁠states can proceed over Trump’s order to restrict mail-in voting – live

https://www.theguardian.com/profile/shannon-ho,https://www.theguardian.com/profile/robert-mackey,https://www.theguardian.com/profile/lucy-campbell,https://www.theguardian.com/profile/maya-yang,https:/· ·2 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 5 views
Lawsuit from Democratic-led ⁠states can proceed over Trump’s order to restrict mail-in voting – live

Federal judge gives green light for states to challenge president’s executive order Sign up for the Breaking News US email He calls the situation a “win-win” for the US. Vance is here, and he starts by claiming that Trump’s peace deal with Iran “is already bearing real fruits for the American people”, with 12.5m barrels going through the strait of Hormuz last night and gas prices dropping below $4 today for the first time since the conflict began. Continue reading...

Original article
the Guardian · https://www.theguardian.com/profile/shannon-ho,https://www.theguardian.com/profile/robert-mackey,https://www.theguardian.com/profile/lucy-campbell,https://www.theguardian.com/profile/maya-yang,https:/
Read full at the Guardian →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

21.35 EDTLawsuit from Democratic-led ⁠states and voting rights groups can proceed over Trump’s executive order to restrict mail votingA federal judge in Boston ruled that Democratic-led ⁠states and voting rights groups could ⁠proceed with lawsuits challenging ​Donald Trump’s executive order that seeks to restrict vote-by-mail ahead of November’s midterm elections.US district judge Indira Talwani, who was nominated by Barack Obama, ruled that the potential for Trump’s order to impact the midterm elections meant the plaintiffs’ cases could not wait to be heard.Trump’s order “both includes multiple specific directives as to certain actions that federal ​agencies must take at specified times and requires that definite ’substantive ‌outcomes’ be implemented that will affect the ‌upcoming…

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at the Guardian.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from the Guardian