WeSearch

New Jersey Supreme Court Requires Transparency for Facial Recognition Evidence

Meagan O'Rourke· ·3 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 5 views
New Jersey Supreme Court Requires Transparency for Facial Recognition Evidence

Prosecutors in New Jersey must disclose how the technology is used in criminal cases, the state’s Supreme Court ruled.

Original article
Reason.com · Meagan O'Rourke
Read full at Reason.com →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Due Process New Jersey Supreme Court Requires Transparency for Facial Recognition Evidence Prosecutors in New Jersey must disclose how the technology is used in criminal cases, the state’s Supreme Court ruled. Meagan O'Rourke | 6.26.2026 12:25 PM Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google Media Contact & Reprint Requests <img src="https://d2eehagpk5cl65.cloudfront.net/img/c800x450-w800-q80/uploads/2026/06/NJ-Surveillance-6-25-800x450.jpg" style="max-width: 100%; height: auto" width="1200" height="675" title="Facial recognition software" alt="Facial recognition software | Adani Samat/Midjourney" /> (Adani Samat/Midjourney) Just like humans may err in recognizing faces, facial recognition technology (FRT) is not without…

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Reason.com.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from Reason.com