WeSearch

Not a theft, but a statement: Inside the Bitcoin proposal to reassign Satoshi-linked coins

·6 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 2 views
#bitcoin#hard fork#satoshi nakamoto#ecash#property rights
Not a theft, but a statement: Inside the Bitcoin proposal to reassign Satoshi-linked coins
⚡ TL;DR · AI summary

A proposed Bitcoin fork called eCash plans to copy Bitcoin's ledger in August but redirect about 500,000 forked coins linked to Satoshi Nakamoto to early investors, sparking backlash over property rights. Critics argue the move sets a dangerous precedent by reallocating balances on a forked chain, even though actual BTC remains untouched. Paul Sztorc, the developer behind eCash, defends the plan as a way to fund innovation and pressure Bitcoin Core to adopt his stalled Drivechains proposal. The debate centers on immutability, moral legitimacy, and whether dormant coins should be treated differently in forked networks.

Key facts
Original article
CoinDesk
Read full at CoinDesk →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

TechShareShare this articleCopy linkX iconX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmailNot a theft, but a statement: Inside the Bitcoin proposal to reassign Satoshi-linked coinsPaul Sztorc says he can't move a single sat of Satoshi's bitcoin and isn't trying to. But critics say rewriting forked-chain balances at addresses a user does not control sets a bad precedent.By Shaurya Malwa|Edited by Jamie Crawley Apr 28, 2026, 2:41 p.m. Make preferred on What to know: A planned August fork called eCash would copy Bitcoin’s ledger and give existing BTC holders equivalent balances on a new chain, while diverting about 500,000 forked coins attributed to Satoshi Nakamoto to early investors.Critics say the plan violates Bitcoin’s core ethic of inviolable property rights by reallocating Satoshi’s famously…

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at CoinDesk.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from CoinDesk