Older Cubans struggle as the economic crisis deepens
Older Cubans are facing increasing hardships as the country's economic crisis worsens, with many struggling to meet basic needs amid shortages and inflation. The U.S. embargo is cited as a contributing factor to the island's economic challenges, exacerbating the difficulties for vulnerable populations like the elderly. With limited government support, seniors are often left to fend for themselves in an increasingly dire situation.
- ▪The economic crisis in Cuba is disproportionately affecting older citizens, who rely on fixed incomes and limited pensions.
- ▪The U.S. embargo is frequently cited by Cuban officials and residents as a major factor worsening economic conditions on the island.
- ▪Many elderly Cubans face food insecurity, lack of access to medicine, and deteriorating living conditions.
- ▪Social support systems are strained, leaving seniors with minimal assistance from the state or family members who may have emigrated.
- ▪Inflation and currency unification policies have further eroded the purchasing power of retirees' pensions.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Older Cubans struggle as the economic crisis deepensThe Associated PressPublished 5 seconds agoAs the U.S. blockade worsens hardship in this Communist island nation, seniors must fend for themselvesThe Associated PressPlease enable JavaScript to view this content.ShareSave for laterPlease log in to bookmark this story.Log InCreate Free AccountMost PopularTrump meets Artemis II crew, says U.S. has 'good shot' at returning to the moonVideo1:05Buffalo hockey fans finish 'O'Canada' after singer's mic glitchesVideo0:47Rescue dogs train on snow capped Mount Etna volcanoVideo1:06Iran's supreme leader says it will protect its nuclear and missile capabilitiesVideo1:19Lawmakers blast and praise Hegseth during House Armed Services hearingVideo1:46Trump discusses prolonged Iran blockade as oil…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The Globe and Mail.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from The Globe and Mail
