<em>The Devil Wears Prada 2</em> Is Full of Beautiful People. Unfortunately, One of Them Sticks Out.
The sequel to The Devil Wears Prada has sparked reflection on societal shallowness, particularly regarding how people judge others' appearances and worth. The casting of Patrick Brammall as Anne Hathaway's love interest has raised concerns about online backlash focused on his looks and perceived status. The article questions whether society has truly progressed in reducing superficial judgments, despite apparent cultural shifts.
- ▪The Devil Wears Prada 2 highlights changes in societal attitudes toward body image and professionalism since the original film.
- ▪Patrick Brammall plays Peter, a contractor and love interest to Anne Hathaway’s character, Andy.
- ▪The author expresses concern that online culture increasingly dismisses men as 'broke' or 'ugly' when paired with high-profile women.
- ▪Anne Hathaway is experiencing a career resurgence and is widely celebrated for her appearance and talent.
- ▪The article critiques the trend of equating physical attractiveness with moral worth in celebrity discourse.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Movies One Character in The Devil Wears Prada 2 Is Going to Cause a Major Controversy. I’m Dreading What That Says About Us All. It truly surprises me how acceptable it’s become to call men broke or ugly. By Heather Schwedel Follow Heather Signed Up For Email Alerts Error Signing Up For Email Alerts Close Enter your email to receive alerts for this author. Thanks for signing up! You can manage your newsletter subscriptions at any time. You're already subscribed to the https://my.sailthru.com/list?list=aa_heather_schwedel newsletter. You can manage your newsletter subscriptions at any time. We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again, or manage all your newsletter subscriptions here . <div class="slate-notification--error"> Please enable javascript to sign up for newsletters.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Slate Magazine.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Slate Magazine
