Penn says it is fighting antisemitism. Its recent tenure decision tells another story
The University of Pennsylvania is facing criticism for granting tenure to Sukaina Hirji, whose activism is linked to campus unrest and antisemitism. This decision raises questions about the university's commitment to addressing antisemitism and the impact of Hirji's actions on the campus climate. Critics argue that rewarding her with tenure contradicts the university's stated goals of restoring trust and accountability.
- ▪The University of Pennsylvania has been claiming to confront antisemitism since the unrest on campus began on October 7, 2023.
- ▪Sukaina Hirji's tenure decision has sparked controversy due to her involvement in protests that disrupted campus life.
- ▪Critics are questioning whether Penn's decision aligns with its public commitment to fighting antisemitism.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
The University of Pennsylvania has spent months claiming it is serious about confronting antisemitism, restoring trust, and repairing the damage caused by campus unrest after Oct. 7, 2023. Yet, Penn has apparently now granted tenure to Sukaina Hirji, whose public activism sits at the center of the very crisis the university claims it is trying to repair. The university now needs to explain how that decision aligns with the standards it has publicly promised to uphold. Recommended Stories The West needs a new strategy toward jihadist Iran regime Iran’s mafia networks have defeated US sanctions Taxation without representation: The blue-state conservative’s silent scream Hirji was not a passive observer of the encampment that disrupted Penn’s campus for over two weeks.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Washington Examiner.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Washington Examiner
