Sam Alito Seems to Think Trump’s Attacks on Haitians Are a Big Joke
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Mullin v. Doe, a case challenging the Trump administration's termination of temporary protected status (TPS) for immigrants from Syria and Haiti. The hearing coincided with the Court's decision in Louisiana v. Callais, which allowed the removal of majority-minority voting districts. Madiba Dennie and Dahlia Lithwick discussed how these cases reflect broader racial and legal tensions in immigration and voting rights policy.
- ▪Temporary protected status (TPS) is a humanitarian program established in 1990 to protect individuals from deportation to countries with dangerous conditions.
- ▪The Trump administration systematically terminated TPS designations for countries like Haiti and Syria, affecting over 1 million long-term residents.
- ▪Racist rhetoric, including false claims about Haitians eating pets, was used to justify ending TPS protections.
- ▪The Supreme Court's decision in Louisiana v. Callais undermined racial equity in voting district design.
- ▪Madiba Dennie criticized the administration's actions as racially motivated and legally unjustified.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Jurisprudence Sam Alito Seems to Think Trump’s Attacks on Haitians Are a Big Joke By Dahlia Lithwick Follow Dahlia Signed Up For Email Alerts Error Signing Up For Email Alerts Close Enter your email to receive alerts for this author. Thanks for signing up! You can manage your newsletter subscriptions at any time. You're already subscribed to the aa_Dahlia_Lithwick newsletter. You can manage your newsletter subscriptions at any time. We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again, or manage all your newsletter subscriptions here . <div class="slate-notification--error"> Please enable javascript to sign up for newsletters. </div> Email address: Sign Up By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms. Sign in or create an account to better manage your email preferences.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Slate Magazine.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Slate Magazine
