State can intervene when religious rights affect secular activities: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court observed that while core religious practices are protected from judicial scrutiny, the State can intervene when religious activities impact secular public life, emphasizing a balance between religious freedom and constitutional duties. The remarks came during a hearing on the interplay between Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution in the context of the Sabarimala dispute. The court stressed that religious autonomy does not permit disruption of civic order or public welfare. It also cautioned against comparative religious arguments, upholding constitutional neutrality.
- ▪The nine-judge bench highlighted that State intervention is permissible when religious practices affect secular activities like public order, health, and morality.
- ▪Justice Nagarathna stated that religious activities cannot disrupt civic life, such as blocking roads, and the State has the authority to act in such cases.
- ▪The court reiterated that Articles 25 and 26 protect religious freedom and denominational rights but are subject to State regulation in secular domains.
- ▪The proceedings stem from the 2018 Sabarimala verdict allowing women of all ages to enter the temple, which sparked broader constitutional questions on religious practice and reform.
- ▪The court warned against arguments promoting religious superiority, emphasizing equality and neutrality in constitutional discourse.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
State can intervene when religious rights affect secular activities: Supreme CourtThe bench emphasised that autonomy in matters of faith, particularly modes of worship and core religious practices, remains insulated from judicial scrutiny.Updated on: Apr 29, 2026 7:33 AM ISTBy Utkarsh Anand, New DelhiShare viaCopy link The Supreme Court on Tuesday observed that while courts cannot sit in judgment over the core religious affairs of a denomination, the State is well within its powers to intervene where the exercise of religious rights affects secular activities, marking a crucial boundary in the ongoing Sabarimala reference.A view of the Supreme Court of India (SCI) building, in New Delhi (ANI)A nine-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant underscored this distinction during an…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Hindustan Times — Top.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Hindustan Times — Top
