‘State can’t choose for citizens’: SC refuses to reopen 15-year-old’s abortion case
The Supreme Court refused to reopen a case regarding the termination of a 15-year-old girl's 28-week pregnancy, emphasizing that reproductive decisions must rest with the individual, not the state or medical institutions. The bench underscored the minor's autonomy and the psychological and social consequences she would face if forced to continue the pregnancy. It dismissed AIIMS's curative plea, stating that neither the government nor hospitals can make such decisions on behalf of capable individuals.
- ▪The Supreme Court declined a curative plea by AIIMS to reconsider its April 24, 2026 order allowing the abortion of a 15-year-old girl's over 28-week pregnancy.
- ▪The court emphasized that reproductive rights lie with the individual and that the state or medical bodies should not override a person's informed decision.
- ▪AIIMS raised medical concerns about risks to the minor's health and potential premature live birth, but the court prioritized the girl's autonomy and future.
- ▪The bench rejected the idea that the state could act as a decision-maker, cautioning against framing the issue as a conflict between an unborn child and the minor girl.
- ▪Following the court's decision, AIIMS confirmed it would proceed with the termination and indicated the minor’s mother might not pursue a pending contempt petition.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
‘State can’t choose for citizens’: SC refuses to reopen 15-year-old’s abortion caseThe Supreme Court said that neither the Centre nor medical institutions could assume the role of decision-makers in such casesPublished on: Apr 30, 2026 12:20 PM ISTBy Utkarsh AnandShare viaCopy link The Supreme Court on Thursday declined to entertain a curative plea filed by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) seeking reconsideration of its April 24 order permitting termination of an over 28-week pregnancy of a 15-year-old Delhi girl, making it clear that neither the Centre nor medical institutions could assume the role of decision-makers in such cases.The Supreme Court foregrounded the minor’s autonomy and the trauma of being forced into motherhood.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Hindustan Times — Top.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Hindustan Times — Top
