Striking at the Heart of Iran
The article discusses the concept of strategic interdiction in military operations, particularly in relation to Iran. It highlights the effectiveness of targeting the core elements of a regime's power to weaken its ability to threaten others. The author suggests that the U.S. has not fully utilized this strategy in its military engagements with Iran, despite the potential benefits.
- ▪Strategic interdiction targets the heart of a regime to diminish its power and influence.
- ▪The U.S. military has engaged in tactical strikes against Iranian military sites but has not fully embraced strategic interdiction.
- ▪Israeli airstrikes have created chaos within Iran's political and military structures, demonstrating the effectiveness of this strategy.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
up next: now reading: Striking at the Heart of Iran Striking at the Heart of IranCOMMENTARY By John TeichertMay 27, 2026 U.S. Central Command U.S. Central Command X Story Stream recent articles Video: Global Warming Lorem Ipsum Dolor Sit ... Article: Global Warming Lorem Ipsum Dolor Sit ... Article: Global Warming Lorem Ipsum Dolor Sit ... Entry: Global Warming Lorem Ipsum Dolor Sit ... Video: Global Warming Lorem Ipsum Dolor Sit ... A century ago, aviation pioneer Brig. Gen. Billy Mitchell advocated for the potency of properly-applied air power. In his seminal treatise from 1925, “Winged Defense,” he wrote: “Aircraft do not need to pierce the line of either navies or armies.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Real Clear Politics.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Real Clear Politics
