The Imbalanced User-AI Relationships as an Ethical Failure of Front-End Design in Healthcare AI

Ethical discourse on AI in healthcare has focused predominantly on back-end concerns such as bias, fairness and explainability, while the front-end interface, where patients and clinicians actually encounter AI outputs, remains under explored. This paper identifies imbalanced user-AI relationships as a distinct class of front-end ethical failure: patients are rendered highly visible to AI systems through data inference, yet cannot understand, question or influence how they are represented. Through the concept of asymmetric legibility and a chat-based telemedicine case, we show how design choices e.g., default recommendations, restricted inputs and suppressed uncertainty, undermine agency, clinician judgment and human oversight even where systems are technically accurate. We propose reciprocity as a design orientation and offer interventions for more balanced, participatory user-AI relationships in healthcare.

More from arXiv cs.AI

Towards Understanding the Expressive Power of GNNs with Global Readout

arXiv cs.AI·2

Avionic Main Fuel Pump Simulation and Fault-Diagnosis Benchmark

arXiv cs.AI·2

Probing Visual Planning in Image Editing Models

arXiv cs.AI·2

IntrAgent: An LLM Agent for Content-Grounded Information Retrieval through Literature Review

arXiv cs.AI·3

MAE-Based Self-Supervised Pretraining for Data-Efficient Medical Image Segmentation Using nnFormer

arXiv cs.AI·4

SwarmDrive: Semantic V2V Coordination for Latency-Constrained Cooperative Autonomous Driving

arXiv cs.AI·2