The Rise of the High-Range, Less Expensive E.V.
Despite a recent slump in U.S. electric vehicle sales due to the loss of federal tax credits, more affordable EVs with high range are entering the market. Models under $40,000 now offer ranges once found only in luxury EVs, with over a dozen options exceeding 250 miles by 2026. This shift decouples vehicle price from driving range, addressing consumer concerns about range anxiety. Automakers are increasingly delivering long-range performance at lower price points.
- ▪As of 2026, more than a dozen electric vehicles under $40,000 offer over 250 miles of range, a significant increase from earlier years.
- ▪The correlation between high price and long range in EVs has weakened, with some budget models now outperforming more expensive ones in range.
- ▪The Chevrolet Bolt and Nissan Leaf are among the affordable models offering high range, with the Leaf reaching up to 303 miles in 2026.
- ▪Range anxiety remains a consumer concern, but improvements in affordable EV range are helping to mitigate it.
- ▪Data accounts for inflation-adjusted prices and uses EPA range estimates, excluding trucks and vehicles over $80,000.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
AdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENTYou have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load.The UpshotSupported bySKIP ADVERTISEMENTThe Rise of the High-Range, Less Expensive E.V.Even as the electric vehicle market has slumped, there are more long-range E.V.s under $40,000 than ever before.Listen · 6:01 min Share full article141By Francesca ParisApril 27, 2026Updated 6:31 a.m. ET window.registerInteractive && window.registerInteractive("100000010805361"); !function(){var e="gps_module_impressions",s="gps_suppress_module",t=new URLSearchParams(window.location.search),o="1"===t.get("gps_debug")?function(e,s){console.log("[gps]",e,void…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at NYT > Business.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from NYT > Business
