Thousands of Pentagon Civilian Workers Will Be Fired Next Week as Purge Begins
The Pentagon plans to fire 5,400 civilian employees next week as part of an initial effort to reduce its civilian workforce by 5% to 8%. This move is part of a broader government-wide initiative under President Donald Trump and advisor Elon Musk to cut federal spending and eliminate non-mission-critical positions. A hiring freeze will follow while the department reviews its long-term personnel needs.
- ▪The Pentagon will begin firing 5,400 probationary civilian employees as part of a workforce reduction initiative.
- ▪Defense Department officials stated the cuts aim to eliminate redundancies and refocus on the president's priorities, including border security and military readiness.
- ▪The reductions follow similar personnel actions at other federal agencies, including the Department of Veterans Affairs.
- ▪Pentagon leadership emphasized starting with probationary employees and poor performers to improve workforce efficiency.
- ▪Plans to fire all probationary workers were reportedly scaled back due to legal concerns raised by CNN.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Military Daily News Updated Feb 22, 2025, 12:07 AM EST { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "1", "name": "Home", "item": "https://military.com/" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position":"2", "name": "Military Daily News", "item": "https://www.military.com/daily-news" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position":"3", "name": "Thousands of Pentagon Civilian Workers Will Be Fired Next Week as Trump Purge Begins", "item": "https://www.military.com/daily-news/2025/02/21/pentagon-fire-5400-civilian-employees-first-step-trumps-purge-of-federal-workers.html" } ] } Thousands of Pentagon Civilian Workers Will Be Fired Next Week as Trump Purge Begins The massive round of firings is part of an "initial effort" to cut the Defense…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Military.com.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Military.com
