Three key statements Starmer made to MPs about Mandelson vetting

Three key statements Starmer made about Mandelson vetting4 hours agoShareSaveAdd as preferred on GoogleAnthony ReubenandBen Chu,BBC VerifyReuters/BBCMPs are to vote on Tuesday over whether Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer should be investigated in Parliament for allegedly misleading the House of Commons.It relates to several comments he made about the process of appointing Lord Mandelson as the UK's ambassador to the US in December 2024. Lord Mandelson was sacked the following September over his links to the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.On Monday night Sir Keir told Labour MPs the accusation he had misled the House was "totally baseless" and accused the Conservatives of a "political stunt".Here, BBC Verify examines three statements the prime minister made in the Commons that his accusers claim were misleading.22 April 2026: 'No pressure existed whatsoever'Sir Keir was asked at Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday 22 April whether he still thought that "full due process" had been followed in the appointment of Lord Mandelson.He replied he did and went on to talk about the evidence given to the Commons Foreign Affairs Select Committee the day before by Sir Olly Robbins - the former top official at the Foreign Office whom the prime minister had recently sacked."Sir Olly Robbins could not have been clearer in his evidence yesterday," the prime minister said at PMQs. "He said that 'I didn't feel under… pressure personally in terms of my judgement'."Sir Keir then claimed: "No pressure existed whatsoever in relation to this case."Sir Olly did tell the committee his decision to grant Lord Mandelson security clearance after a vetting process was not affected by pressure from No 10 Downing Street. Watch key moments from sacked Foreign Office chief's testimonyBut Sir Olly also told the committee that "my office and the foreign secretary's office were under constant pressure. There was an atmosphere of constant chasing".Asked about where the pressure was coming from Sir Olly said the source he "was most conscious of was from the No 10 private office".No 10 has said Sir Keir meant there was only pressure to get the appointment approved as soon as possible - not the final decision on whether to grant vetting clearance.The prime minister told the Sunday Times there were "different types of pressure". "There's pressure – 'Can we get this done quickly?' – which is not an unusual pressure. That is the everyday pressure of government," he said.10 September 2025: 'Full due process was followed during this appointment'On 10 September 2025, as more details emerged about Lord Mandelson's friendship with Epstein, Sir Keir was asked by Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch if he had been aware of the pair's connections when he made the appointment in December 2024.The prime minister told MPs: "Full due process was followed during this appointment."On 16 April 2026 it emerged the body that carries out developed vetting - UK Security Vetting (UKSV) - had recommended that Lord Mandelson should not be given security clearance for his ambassador's role.Sir Olly confirmed to the Foreign Affairs Select Committee on 21 April that he personally approved Lord Mandelson's security vetting clearance and did not tell the prime minister about the initial recommendations of UKSV - which he said was the proper process.Sir Olly said in a letter to the committee: "When the prime minister informed the House that the proper process had been followed in respect of…

This excerpt is published under fair use for community discussion. Read the full article at BBC News.