Trump reviewing latest Iran proposal, but ‘can’t imagine it would be acceptable’
President Donald Trump stated he would review Iran's 14-point proposal but expressed skepticism about its acceptability, citing Iran's past actions. The proposal, delivered via an intermediary in Pakistan, includes demands such as the release of frozen assets, removal of sanctions, and an end to military hostilities. Iran rejected a U.S.-proposed two-month ceasefire, insisting on resolving issues within 30 days with a focus on ending the war.
- ▪Iran submitted a 14-point proposal to the United States through an intermediary in Pakistan.
- ▪The proposal includes demands for the release of frozen Iranian assets, removal of sanctions, and an end to U.S. military presence near Iran.
- ▪Trump stated he 'can’t imagine' the proposal would be acceptable because Iran has not paid a 'big enough price' for its actions over the past 47 years.
- ▪Iran rejected a two-month U.S. ceasefire proposal, insisting issues be resolved within 30 days.
- ▪NPR reported additional demands in the proposal, including reparations, guarantees against future military aggression, and an end to the naval blockade, though the outlet has not verified the document.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
President Donald Trump told reporters on Saturday afternoon that he will review Iran’s latest 14-point proposal before saying on Truth Social that he “can’t imagine that it would be acceptable.” The comments followed Iran’s submission of a 14-point plan to the United States, according to the Tasnim news agency, a media outlet affiliated with Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, according to CNN. Recommended Stories China blocks US sanctions on five refineries accused of buying Iranian oil $8.6 billion in arms sales approved for Middle East allies Iran war is ‘us taking out the trash’: Tiana Lowe Doescher Trump spoke to reporters before boarding a plane in Palm Beach, Florida, where he was asked about the latest updates regarding the Iran war.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Washington Examiner.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Washington Examiner
