WeSearch

You Know How You Feel Overwhelmed With Content on Social Media? Well, a Similar Thing Is Happening in Science.

Steve Midway· ·7 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 8 views
#science#peer review#publishing#research#academia#Steve Midway#MDPI#Frontiers Media#Slate#Olga Yastremska#wabeno
You Know How You Feel Overwhelmed With Content on Social Media? Well, a Similar Thing Is Happening in Science.
⚡ TL;DR · AI summary

The scientific community is facing a growing imbalance between the volume of manuscripts submitted for publication and the capacity of peer reviewers to evaluate them. This surge in submissions, driven by publishing incentives and the expansion of open-access journals, risks weakening the quality and reliability of scientific research. As a result, peer review is becoming slower and more strained, threatening the integrity of scientific progress.

Key facts
Original article
Slate Magazine · Steve Midway
Read full at Slate Magazine →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Science Publish and Perish I’m the editor in chief of a scientific journal. There’s a disastrous imbalance happening with the labor around manuscripts. By Steve Midway May 03, 202610:00 AM Photo illustration by Slate. Photos by Olga Yastremska/iStock/Getty Images Plus and wabeno/iStock/Getty Images Plus. Copy Link Share Share Comment Copy Link Share Share Comment Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily. Recently, an ordinary manuscript landed on my desk. Nothing flashy—the solid work that represents another brick in the wall of science. The hard part wasn’t deciding whether it belonged in a journal that I oversee as editor in chief. The hard part was finding anyone willing to review it.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Slate Magazine.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from Slate Magazine