WeSearch

The Half of CI We Forgot to Automate

Sebastian Sastre· ·3 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 3 views
#software engineering#continuous integration#testing#reliability#devops
The Half of CI We Forgot to Automate
⚡ TL;DR · AI summary

The article draws a parallel between rigorous physical testing in aerospace and the lack of equivalent practices in software deployment, highlighting that current CI pipelines focus on symbolic correctness rather than real-world behavior. While automated tests verify internal consistency, they fail to produce evidence that systems perform reliably under realistic conditions. The author argues for a shift toward realistic, repeatable testing that generates verifiable evidence for go/no-go decisions.

Key facts
Original article
Selective Creativity · Sebastian Sastre
Read full at Selective Creativity →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

The Half of CI We Forgot to Automate Why go/no-go decisions still run on faith in contracts, and the gap between pipelines that prove correctness and pipelines that produce evidence. April 17, 2026 A new aircraft does not get cleared to fly because its blueprint is internally consistent. It gets cleared because someone strapped it to a rig, ran it through scripted abuse, instrumented every joint, and — after hours and hours of tests — produced evidence that the design survives a controlled approximation of the real world. That ritual has a name in aerospace and motorsport — shakedown — and it exists because the cost of guessing is paid in catastrophic failures, irreparable damage to human lives, and the heavy material losses that follow.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Selective Creativity.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments